The PLJ 1996 SC (AJK) one hundred sixty five circumstance concerned a fit for possession submitted with the predecessor-in-interest on the respondents. The trial courtroom decreed the match, but the very first appellate courtroom dismissed it within the grounds of not impleading other co-sharers as defendants. The Superior Court put https://illegalencroachmentslawye44225.pointblog.net/helping-the-others-realize-the-advantages-of-mortgage-and-security-interests-lawyer-in-karachi-near-me-73205039